Elena Foukes
  • About
    • About Elena
    • Professional Biography
    • Resources >
      • Climate Investing
      • Recipes >
        • Recipes
    • Event Archive >
      • Events
      • 2014 Event Archive
      • 2015 Event Archive
      • 2016 Event Archive
      • 2017 Event Archive
  • Writings
    • Writings
    • Resources / Favorite things
  • Offgrid
    • BoatLife
    • Vanlife
    • Mountaintop
    • Joshua Tree

The EPA's proposed regulation, more to it than meets the eyes

6/11/2014

 
At first glance, the proposed EPA regulation seems straight forward: 30% reduction in carbon intensity of the electricity industry by 2030 compared to 2005 levels. However, the compliance targets vary widely from state to state.

"The intensity-reduction targets range from 72% in Washington State to 11% in North Dakota The reductions would take place between EPA’s base measurement year of 2012 and the proposed full-compliance deadline of  2030. Neither the timeline of these state goals (2012-2030, vs. 2005-2030) nor the metric being used (measure of CO2 intensity usage vs. total CO2 volume reduction) match."  wrote Bloomberg New Energy Finance in a white paper which explains the complexities.

There are also the legal issues. The Clean Power Plan regulates a network of electricity matters in states when up until now, the EPA only regulated individual emission points/individual plants. It is likely that states and electricity generating companies will challenge the ability of the EPA to enforce regulations this way. States will also challenge the varied emissions targets, accusing the EPA of unequal treatment. 

Yes, the EPA is treating each state separately, but only after taking into account the measures and abilities of each state. Washington state's reduction target of 72% is partly based on the expectation that TransAlta’s 1,460MW Centralia, WA, coal plant will be decommissioned between 2020 and 2030, an EPA official said during a background briefing for reporters and analysts. Other states have less aggressive targets because they may have limited access to new, cleaner natural gas plants. 

The proposed rule considers four (4) building blocks in reducing carbon intensity (lbs CO2/MWh). 
  1. Efficiency of existing coal plants
  2. Increase usage of natural gas plants - they emit about a third of what a coal plant does
  3. Renewables and nuclear - some environmentalists will find the inclusion of nuclear hard to swallow, but we have to do something now, and nuclear is the best option for a centralized, zero-emission grid.
  4. Energy efficiency - this also includes demand response, which would shave peak load so dirty plants don't have to turn on. 

30-35 states are likely to start on their implementation plan this summer for compliance as planned. That leaves 15-20 states to challenge the regulation in courts. Legal issues related to the Clean Power Plain will be resolved by 2018, a mere two years before aggressive targets need to be met. 

Since states are allowed to partner with other states to reach targets, analysts expect the regulation to result in a default national cost of carbon. California and RGGI, the East Coast's cap and trade program, are likely to be models for other states to follow. California's GHG and CO2 programs will need to be restructured so that electricity generation can be measured independently of other carbon reduction measures across the state. RGGI will require fewer modifications. 

All views expressed here are for the purpose of meaningful dialogue and are solely my opinion. 



    These posts compliment my weekly newsletter: 
    Sign me up!

    Archives

    January 2023
    August 2022
    May 2022
    February 2022
    May 2021
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2018
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    February 2015
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014

    Categories

    All
    Career Development
    Cleantech
    Connectomatic
    Diversity
    Diversity In Tech
    Environment
    EPA
    Green Economy
    Interesting Stories
    Negotiation
    Networking
    Networking Tips
    Salary
    Smart Grid
    Social
    Startup
    Women2.0
    YPE

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • About
    • About Elena
    • Professional Biography
    • Resources >
      • Climate Investing
      • Recipes >
        • Recipes
    • Event Archive >
      • Events
      • 2014 Event Archive
      • 2015 Event Archive
      • 2016 Event Archive
      • 2017 Event Archive
  • Writings
    • Writings
    • Resources / Favorite things
  • Offgrid
    • BoatLife
    • Vanlife
    • Mountaintop
    • Joshua Tree